Interferential laser therapy in the treatment of shoulder pain and disability from musculoskeletal pathologies: a randomised comparative study.

Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):143-50. Epub 2011 May 28.

Montes-Molina RPrieto-Baquero AMartínez-Rodríguez MERomojaro-Rodríguez ABGallego-Méndez VMartínez-Ruiz F.

Source

Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Interference is an important feature of the waves. When two or more in phase light waves meet, a new and reinforced wave is generated. Shoulder pain is a common clinical problem and laser is one of the treatments frequently used to relieve it.

OBJECTIVE:

To test the safety of interferential laser therapy generated by two independent low level lasers and compare its effectiveness with conventional single laser therapy in the reduction of shoulder musculoskeletal pain and associated disability.

Leggi l’articolo completo

Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Orofac Pain. 2011 Fall;25(4):298-307.

Petrucci ASgolastra FGatto RMattei AMonaco A.

Source

Gnathology Department, School of Dentistry, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy. petrucci.ambra@gmail.com

Abstract

AIM:

To assess the scientific evidence on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Leggi l’articolo completo

Effectiveness of Physiotherapy and GaAlAs Laser in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 May;30(5):275-80.

Dostalová THlinakova PKasparova MRehacek AVavrickova LNavrátil L.

Source

1 Department of Paediatric Stomatology, 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University , Prague, Czech Republic .

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a treatment method commonly used in physiotherapy for musculoskeletal
disorders. The aim of this study was to monitor the function of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding tissues and compare Leggi l’articolo completo

Clinical effectiveness of low-level laser therapy as an adjunct to eccentric exercise for the treatment of achilles’ tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):733-9.

Tumilty SMcDonough SHurley DABaxter GD.

Source

Centre for Physiotherapy Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Abstract

Tumilty S, McDonough S, Hurley DA, Baxter GD. Clinical effectiveness of low-level laser therapy as an adjunct to eccentric exercise for the treatment of Achilles’ tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Leggi l’articolo completo

Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in patients with acute and chronic temporomandibular disorders.

Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Feb 25. [Epub ahead of print]

Salmos-Brito JAde Menezes RFTeixeira CEGonzaga RKRodrigues BHBraz RBessa-Nogueira RVde Martínez Gerbi ME.

Source

Dental School, University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil, janainasalmos@hotmail.com.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to address the following question: among patients with acute or chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMD), doeslow-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduce pain intensity and improve maximal mouth opening? The sample comprised  Leggi l’articolo completo

Interferential laser therapy in the treatment of shoulder pain and disability from musculoskeletal pathologies: a randomised comparative study.

Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):143-50. Epub 2011 May 28.

Montes-Molina RPrieto-Baquero AMartínez-Rodríguez MERomojaro-Rodríguez ABGallego-Méndez VMartínez-Ruiz F.

Source

Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Interference is an important feature of the waves. When two or more in phase light waves meet, a new and reinforced wave is generated. Shoulder pain is a common clinical problem and laser is one of the treatments frequently used to relieve it.

Leggi l’articolo completo

Effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.

Ann Med. 2003;35(1):51-62.

Smidt NAssendelft WJArola HMalmivaara AGreens SBuchbinder Rvan der Windt DABouter LM.

Source

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.smidt.emgo@med.vu.nl

Abstract

AIM:

To evaluate the available evidence of the effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis of the elbow.

METHOD:

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified by a highly sensitive search strategy in six databases in combination with reference checking. Two independent reviewers selected RCTs that included a physiotherapy intervention, patients with lateral epicondylitis, and at least one clinically relevant outcome measure. No language restrictions were made. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two blinded reviewers. A best evidence synthesis, including a quantitative and qualitative analysis, was conducted, weighting the studies with respect to their internal validity, statistical significance, clinical relevance, and statistical power.

RESULTS:

23 RCTs were included in the review, evaluating the effects of lasertherapy, ultrasound treatment, electrotherapy, and exercises and mobilisation techniques. Fourteen studies satisfied at least 50% of the internal validity criteria. Except for ultrasound, pooling of data from RCTs was not possible because of insufficient data, or clinical or statistical heterogeneity. The pooled estimate of the treatment effects of two studies on ultrasound compared to placebo ultrasound, showed statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in favour of ultrasound. There is insufficient evidence either to demonstrate benefit or lack of effect of lasertherapy, electrotherapy, exercises and mobilisation techniques for lateral epicondylitis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the large number of studies, there is still insufficient evidence for most physiotherapy interventions for lateral epicondylitis due to contradicting results, insufficient power, and the low number of studies per intervention. Only for ultrasound, weak evidence for efficacy was found. More better designed, conducted and reported RCTs are needed.

PMID:12693613

 

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pubblicato su PubMed a http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12693613

The effectiveness of nonoperative treatment for frozen shoulder: a systematic review.

Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Mar;22(2):168-9.

Tashjian RZ.

Source

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of nonoperative interventions in the management of frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).

DATA SOURCES:

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Pedro were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of interventions for primary adhesive capsulitis (search words included frozen shoulder, shoulder pain, and periarthritis) up to April 2008.

STUDY SELECTION:

Selection criteria required that studies included patients with frozen shoulder; the disorder was not caused by acute trauma or systemic disease; an intervention for treating adhesive capsulitis was evaluated; the outcome measures included pain, function, or recovery and were reported separately for patients in the study with adhesive capsulitis; and the article was written in English, French, German, or Dutch. Two reviewers independently selected relevant studies from the search results and resolved disagreements by consensus. The findings from 5 Cochrane reviews and 18 recent additional RCTs were included.

DATA EXTRACTION:

Information on the study population, interventions, outcome measures, and results was extracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second. Methodologic quality was assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Heterogeneity of the studies was such that the data could not be quantitatively assessed. The level of evidence was ranked as strong, moderate, limited, or conflicting, depending on the consistency of positive findings and the quality of the RCTs; as no differences in effectiveness found; and as no evidence for the intervention from reviews or RCTs.

MAIN RESULTS:

There was strong evidence in the short term for the effectiveness of intra-articular steroid injections for pain but not range of motion and moderate evidence for steroid injections for pain in the medium term. No differences were found on range of motion between steroid injections and manipulation. There was moderate evidence in favor of arthrographic distension compared with steroid injections in the short term. Among physiotherapy interventions, there was strong evidence in favor of laser therapy compared with placebo in producing a good outcome and some evidence for reduced pain and disability. There was moderate evidence for several mobilization techniques in the short and long term and in combination with exercise. There was moderate evidence in the short term for the effectiveness of oral steroids compared with placebo or no treatment for pain relief and range of motion and for suprascapular nerve block compared with acupuncture, placebo, or steroid injections for painrelief.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pain, range of motion, and overall outcome in adhesive capsulitis were most effectively improved by steroid injections, laser therapy, some mobilization techniques, arthrographic distension, and suprascapular nerve block. Most effects were shown in the short term, although physiotherapy did show effects in the longer term.

PMID:22388345
[PubMed - in process]
Pubblicato su PubMed a http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22388345

Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Orofac Pain. 2011 Fall;25(4):298-307.

Petrucci ASgolastra FGatto RMattei AMonaco A.

Source

Gnathology Department, School of Dentistry, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy. petrucci.ambra@gmail.com

Abstract

AIM:

To assess the scientific evidence on the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

METHODS:

The databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and PEDro were manually and electronically searched up to February 2010. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the quality of the publications. A meta-analysis- was performed to quantify the pooled effect of LLLT on pain and function in patients with chronic TMD.

RESULTS:

The literature search identified 323 papers without overlap between selected databases, but after the two-phase study selection, only six randomized clinical trials (RCT) were included in the systematic review. The primary outcome of interest was the change in pain from baseline to endpoint. The pooled effect of LLLT on pain, measured through a visual analog scale with a mean difference of 7.77 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.49 to 18.02), was not statistically significant from placebo. Change from baseline to endpoint of secondary outcomes was 4.04 mm (95% CI 3.06 to 5.02) for mandibular maximum vertical opening; 1.64 mm (95% CI 0.10 to 3.17) for right lateral excursion and 1.90 mm (95% CI: -4.08 to 7.88) for left lateral excursion.

CONCLUSION:

Currently, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of TMD.

PMID:22247925

 [PubMed - in process]Pubblicato su PubMed a http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247925